Television

An “Insider’s” View of “The Farnsworth Invention”

(The La Jolla Playhouse "page to stage" workshop production of Aaron Sorkin’s The Farnsworth Invention wrapped up its run on Sunday, March 25; with that in mind, what follows should really be read as "past tense.")

Sorkin2_300_2
In an open discussion with audience following the Sunday, March 18 matinée performance of The Farnsworth Invention at the La Jolla Playhouse, playwright (and screenwriter and TV impresario) Aaron Sorkin quipped that with his years of experience in the business, he’d learned to give the audience what it wants: "…and it’s clear to me that what the audience wants is a play about 1930s patent law…" 

I can’t speak for the rest of the audience, but anybody who knows me knows that that is precisely what I’ve been advocating for….oh, thirty-some years now.  So I filed into the theater this past Saturday night with a perspective quite unique from that of anybody else who was in the hall, because I have been living with this material all that time, and know the "true story" probably better than I know my own life story.

I must confess, I entered the theater at first fully expecting to hate everything that was about to unfold before me. I had sufficient "advance knowlege" of what I was about to see that I was certain there was no way I was gonna like it.  And, indeed, after the first viewing, I was entirely conflicted about the disparity between the production’s dramatic impact and its divergence from what I would consider historical propriety.

Fortunately, I am not only writing this review from the unique perspective of my "insider’s knowledge" of the facts; I also saw the play twice  — first on Saturday evening, and then again Sunday afternoon.  What I realized on the second viewing was that I had watched the first performance with my nit-picker turned up ‘to eleven.’  I actually made all kinds of notes about little details that were "wrong."  But when I watched it again Sunday, I left the nit-picker at the door, which freed me to sit back and enjoy the production as any newcomer to the material might. And from that perspective, I was much better able to appreciate the scope — and, yes, the grandeur — of what has been accomplished here. 

But first, try to imagine the trepidation I felt as I settled into my seat on Saturday night and waited for the lights to dim…

An “Insider’s” View of “The Farnsworth Invention” Read More »

Spielberg Taking “Farnsworth” to Broadway?

Variety.com – Inside Move: Spielberg funds play?. Is Steven Spielberg helping to usher in Aaron Sorkin’s return to Broadway? It’s looking likely, with chatter surfacing on both coasts that Spielberg is joining Broadway producing org Dodger Theatricals ("Jersey Boys") for a Rialto production of Sorkin’s play "The Farnsworth Invention." Spielberg is planning to put up

Spielberg Taking “Farnsworth” to Broadway? Read More »

Baird -v- Farnsworth – AGAIN

Bairdsit
I used to get an e-mail from somebody like every other week reminding me that John Logie Baird demonstrated a mechanical television system in 1926, and that he should be therefore regarded as the "inventor of television."  But until this morning It had been so long since I’d gotten one, I thought maybe the Baird crowd had finally seen the light (as it were).  So imagine my surprise when this showed up in my e-mail this morning:

– – – – –

From: "Bernard V. de Lara"
Subject:
just a few questions

Dear Paul :
 
I’m not American but just someone writing to you from France.  I was wondering : convincing though you are about Philo being the real
inventor of television, I found this British website that seems even
more convincing about Baird being the real inventor of television. I’m really
honest in trying to find the truth, but how do you account for the following
excerpts ?

— The man behind the demonstration was a 37-year-old Scotsman called John
Logie Baird. And what he showed on screen, 19 months before Farnsworth, was far
superior to  Farnsworth’s "blob of light", as it was famously described by
Albert Abramson in The History
of Television.

— When Neil Armstrong set
foot on the moon, the camera used to transmit the live pictures was based on
Baird’s Field Sequential Colour System, because this was the best and most
reliable available.

— Virtually nothing of Farnsworth’s technology is
delivered to our living rooms today.

 
Those were taken from the following site:
 
Thanks for any answer you can provide me with.
Bernard

– – – –

To which I have replied:

Dear Bernard:

As the website you mention points out, Baird’s system was mechanical.  It was obsolete the moment it was demonstrated.  Saying Baird invented television is sorta like saying that the first guy who hooked a horse up to a cart invented the motor car.   Or that the first person who put a match to a candle invented the light-bulb.

Farnsworth’s contribution was seminal:  it removed all the mechanical contrivances, and demonstrated a mastery of quantum physics previously unknown.  I like to call it "the leap from parts to particles."   I find Abramson’s assessment of a "blob of light" particularly laughable.  That "blob of light" proved a principal, and had Abramson’s own patrons — Zworykin, RCA — clamoring for the patent rights to that principal. 

Baird -v- Farnsworth – AGAIN Read More »